![]() ![]() These beliefs of bigotry have been the driving force for genocide and systemic persecution of humans merely for being different. What they do not realize or probably do not care about is that this trivialization of bigotry makes a mockery of the darkest emotions that humans have. What is worst is that the proponents of these ideas are not necessarily true believers they do it because they know it avails them of lucrative opportunities in the ecosystem. These days all that is invented is new kinds of theoretical categories of pronouns, sexuality, gender, and hashtags. Once upon a time, inventors developed innovations that were beneficial to mankind such as the steam engine, the light bulb, the airplane, etc. Soon all growth comes to a permanent end. Instead of challenging themselves by being subjected to different perspectives, they prefer safe spaces and echo chambers. Instead of looking at the world with a healthy amount of skepticism but an open mind, they look at every event from the perspective of racism, sexism, homophobia, and xenophobia. Instead of striving for excellence, they strive to find new reasons to be offended in order to prove their moral superiority. Instead of applying their energies to innovate, they are perennially focused on trivialities such as gender types and pronouns. Instead of triggering healthy debates and discussions, the young are perpetually ‘triggered’ by everything from a red cap with a white letter that isn’t a MAGA hat but looks like one to the text in Roald Dahl’s books for children. When young minds are influenced, the results are devastating. They may get lucky, perhaps Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who is struggling with myriad catastrophes in Transportation, will use the article to virtue signal or push initiatives to clean up his image.īeyond this specific study, this is demonstrable proof of how far academic institutions and their faculty have drifted from their original purpose of enlightening young minds. Their sole purpose now seems to be to divide people into groups where minorities are the victims, and the majority are the perpetrators. The professor was informed about the conclusion he had to arrive at, he merely worked his way backward to develop these preposterous claims of racist freeways and infrastructure. The third possibility is that electric car manufacturers or anyone who stands to gain from the green energy sector have either funded the study or donated generously to the university. They probably realize that their gravely misleading assertion would trigger a backlash which enabled him to claim victimhood, which again helps their cause. They probably hope that the ludicrous claims would help their careers and the University financially. The second possibility is that proponents know that such claims are music to the ears of the members of the echo chamber of the left. ![]() Perhaps they also believe in claims of racially-motivated freeway infrastructure planning. The first is that the professor, the LA Times, and those who approved and funded the study really believe that climate change will end the planet and that eliminating gasoline vehicles is the only solution. The study faced backlash on social media, particularly Twitter, which is free from the tyranny of the left. ![]() The solutions prescribed range from banning gasoline vehicles, obviously, and allowing more apartment construction in wealthier neighborhoods. "Today, many residents of the county’s whiter, more affluent neighborhoods - who were often able to keep highways out of their own backyards - commute to work through lower-income Black and Latino neighborhoods bisected by the 10, 110, and 105 freeways and more." Roth revealed that Boeing told him, “…it largely comes down to the shameful history of Los Angeles County’s low-income communities of color being torn apart to make way for freeways - a history that has been extensively documented by The Times" The study is titled 'Local Inequities in the Relative Production of and exposure to Vehicular Air Pollution in Los Angeles' – and was authored by Professor Geoff Boeing. “ It’s a function of the racism that shaped this city and its suburbs, and continues to influence our daily lives - and a stark reminder of the need for climate solutions that benefit everyone." " who drive more tend to be exposed to less air pollution - and Angelenos who drive less tend to be exposed to more pollution. “ Decades of racially-motivated freeway infrastructure planning and residential segregation shape today's disparities in who produces vehicular air pollution and who is exposed to it, but opportunities exist for urban planning and transport policy to mitigate this injustice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |